By 
The notion of ‘Real World Asset Tokenization,’ which has been in the limelight recently in the realm of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is being touted as a revolutionary concept. However, the reality is far from the hype, as many experts argue that the idea of it is fundamentally flawed. One of the primary reasons being the juxtaposition of the digital world and the physical world in less than flawless execution.
Asset tokenization proposes the idea of turning tangible assets into digital tokens that can be traded on a blockchain network. It brings forth added advantages like improved liquidity and accessibility, faster and more transparent transactions, and a potentially global marketplace. However, the concept relies heavily on ‘trust’ which is ironic as blockchain and cryptocurrencies were designed to eliminate ‘trust’ from the equation.
Moreover, the physical world’s laws do not readily translate into the digital domain. For example, in a situation where the ownership of an asset is disputed in the real world or even in the event of theft, how do these real-world situations manifest in the digital token world? The absence of a suitable resolution method proposes a flaw in the tokenization process. The tokenization of real-world assets could potentially introduce more complications than solutions, ultimately making the whole concept ineffective.
To accurately conceptualize ‘asset tokenization’, it is essential to reconsider the deterministic nature of blockchain networks and their role in commodifying the real world. Until an effective way of dealing with real-world complications is discovered, ‘real-world asset tokenization’ will remain an illusion and false narrative in the blockchain and cryptocurrency landscape.
Source: CoinDesk
Comments