By 
The possible prosecution of Roman Storm hinges on a debate that has wider implications for the cryptocurrency industry. The question – whether it is conduct or the actual code, which should be the deciding factor in such legal cases, could shape future legal proceedings concerning developers in the cryptocurrency field. Roman Storm, an eminent developer in the blockchain space, is being investigated over allegations of manipulating DeFi protocols.
Roman Storm came into the limelight following accusations of his exploits in the blossoming world of Decentralised Finance (DeFi). The evidence indicated that he underhandedly exploited a DeFi lending platform, leaving the broader community questioning the ethics and legalities around such activities. Storm’s conduct is undoubtedly controversial, but policy and legality in this emerging field are still tricky to discern. The realm of cryptocurrency and blockchain is famously under-regulated, and while Storm’s alleged actions may seem unethical, they may not necessarily be illegal based on the written code.
Active conducts in the cryptocurrency sphere are usually governed by the ‘code’, functioning as the underlying binding law. Hence, if Storm managed to manipulate a protocol according to its own code, it could be argued that he was merely operating within the boundaries of the system. However, such arguments highlight a critical issue at the heart of the Blockchain community – the controversial balance between ethics and the inflexibility of codes.
The Roman Storm case has opened the doors for revisiting the conducts in the cryptocurrency world that may need ethical examination. To conclude, the eventual outcome in the case against Roman Storm could redefine the blurred lines between the code and conduct, bringing drastic changes in legal implications for developers in the blockchain and cryptocurrency fields.
Source: CoinDesk
Comments